<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Zaskoda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zaskoda.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zaskoda.com</link>
	<description>Don't follow me, you won't make it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Women Regarding Starling&#8217;s &#8220;Schrödinger’s Rapist&#8221; by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2009/10/12/a-response-to-women-regarding-starlings-schrodinger%e2%80%99s-rapist/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/?p=389#comment-884</guid>
		<description>Brilliantly done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliantly done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fit For The Burn, Twenty O’ Nine, Day 2 by Lee Barta</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2009/08/05/fit-for-the-burn-twenty-o%e2%80%99-nine-day-2/comment-page-1/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Barta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/?p=328#comment-883</guid>
		<description>Interested in the offer from WTCM radio in Traverse MI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested in the offer from WTCM radio in Traverse MI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Electing The 99%, an open letter&#8230;. by Kevin Carroll</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2011/11/01/electing-the-99/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/?p=5704#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Great concept!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great concept!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Day 9: Happy Thanksgiving! by paul</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2007/11/22/day-9-happy-thanksgiving/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/2007/11/22/day-9-happy-thanksgiving/#comment-871</guid>
		<description>The VehiCross was a very innovative sports utility vehicle developed from the house of Isuzu, which looks very solid from the exterior, and possess powerful engine specs, which make it one of the best choices for off-road driving activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The VehiCross was a very innovative sports utility vehicle developed from the house of Isuzu, which looks very solid from the exterior, and possess powerful engine specs, which make it one of the best choices for off-road driving activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Worlds First Steampunk Snowboard by Surfing the Web: Steampunk Snowboard &#171; El Surfeador</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2009/04/13/the-worlds-first-steampunk-snowboard/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Surfing the Web: Steampunk Snowboard &#171; El Surfeador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/?p=163#comment-870</guid>
		<description>[...] But, what I did find was a link to a DIY blog on: &#8220;How to build a steampunk snowboard.&#8221; It&#8217;s not quite surfing, but it&#8217;s still pretty fricken sweet. Check out the blog to learn more. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But, what I did find was a link to a DIY blog on: &#8220;How to build a steampunk snowboard.&#8221; It&#8217;s not quite surfing, but it&#8217;s still pretty fricken sweet. Check out the blog to learn more. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Women Regarding Starling&#8217;s &#8220;Schrödinger’s Rapist&#8221; by Zaskoda</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2009/10/12/a-response-to-women-regarding-starlings-schrodinger%e2%80%99s-rapist/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaskoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/?p=389#comment-867</guid>
		<description>@udolipixie: Your analogy in #3 would be more accurate if you also assumed that the girl did, in fact, enjoy anal and then proceeded to treat her as if she did until she proved that she didn&#039;t. It is a shame, although no surprise, that the AFC reference was lost on you. Thanks for taking the time to read and respond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@udolipixie: Your analogy in #3 would be more accurate if you also assumed that the girl did, in fact, enjoy anal and then proceeded to treat her as if she did until she proved that she didn&#8217;t. It is a shame, although no surprise, that the AFC reference was lost on you. Thanks for taking the time to read and respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Women Regarding Starling&#8217;s &#8220;Schrödinger’s Rapist&#8221; by udolipixie</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2009/10/12/a-response-to-women-regarding-starlings-schrodinger%e2%80%99s-rapist/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>udolipixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/?p=389#comment-866</guid>
		<description>&quot;Her demands amount to 1) don’t sexually assault me; 2) don’t contact me when I ask you not to contact me; and 3) don’t pester me when my body language signals I want to be left alone. She is not saying that men don’t have a right to occupy the same public spaces as women. She is not saying that she has the right to pepper spray you if she isn’t in the mood to talk to you. And she is definitely not accusing all men of being rapists. &quot;

Thank you Eric I did not get the same impression of the article that Zaskoda apparently did.

1. The student/teacher analogy seemed quite a far reach to domination/control. I also didn&#039;t get any oppressive feelings then again perhaps I don&#039;t feel oppressed when someone wants to give me their opinion on something.

2. I also got this was preventing being a victim rather than holding the stance of being a victim.

3. &quot;She is justifying her behavior with the false fear that all men are rapists. &quot;...yeah I didn&#039;t get that since she never stated, suggested, or implied all men were rapists. All she stated was that I don&#039;t know whether you&#039;re a rapist or not because I don&#039;t know you. Just like I don&#039;t know whether that girl walking past me likes anal or not because I don&#039;t know her.

I also find his AFC references unnecessary rambling based on the authors own negativity and emotional response to the article.

I also didn&#039;t find you arguing but merely asking him how he got this impression when everything in the article suggest otherwise.

You probably won&#039;t ever see this but I just got emailed this and the guys wanted to know how did this author get that impression from the article.

Had to comment knowing there was a guy out there who didn&#039;t get Zaskoda&#039;s impression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Her demands amount to 1) don’t sexually assault me; 2) don’t contact me when I ask you not to contact me; and 3) don’t pester me when my body language signals I want to be left alone. She is not saying that men don’t have a right to occupy the same public spaces as women. She is not saying that she has the right to pepper spray you if she isn’t in the mood to talk to you. And she is definitely not accusing all men of being rapists. &#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you Eric I did not get the same impression of the article that Zaskoda apparently did.</p>
<p>1. The student/teacher analogy seemed quite a far reach to domination/control. I also didn&#8217;t get any oppressive feelings then again perhaps I don&#8217;t feel oppressed when someone wants to give me their opinion on something.</p>
<p>2. I also got this was preventing being a victim rather than holding the stance of being a victim.</p>
<p>3. &#8220;She is justifying her behavior with the false fear that all men are rapists. &#8220;&#8230;yeah I didn&#8217;t get that since she never stated, suggested, or implied all men were rapists. All she stated was that I don&#8217;t know whether you&#8217;re a rapist or not because I don&#8217;t know you. Just like I don&#8217;t know whether that girl walking past me likes anal or not because I don&#8217;t know her.</p>
<p>I also find his AFC references unnecessary rambling based on the authors own negativity and emotional response to the article.</p>
<p>I also didn&#8217;t find you arguing but merely asking him how he got this impression when everything in the article suggest otherwise.</p>
<p>You probably won&#8217;t ever see this but I just got emailed this and the guys wanted to know how did this author get that impression from the article.</p>
<p>Had to comment knowing there was a guy out there who didn&#8217;t get Zaskoda&#8217;s impression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kitchen Sponge Best Practices by Ebony</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2009/05/20/kitchen-sponge-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/?p=222#comment-860</guid>
		<description>Eeewww maggots in a sponge!!!! How could ppl not know to clean there sponges properly and to use one on the kitchen bathroom and cat dish ??? oooooo nooooo SMH super grose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eeewww maggots in a sponge!!!! How could ppl not know to clean there sponges properly and to use one on the kitchen bathroom and cat dish ??? oooooo nooooo SMH super grose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Women Regarding Starling&#8217;s &#8220;Schrödinger’s Rapist&#8221; by Zaskoda</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2009/10/12/a-response-to-women-regarding-starlings-schrodinger%e2%80%99s-rapist/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaskoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/?p=389#comment-856</guid>
		<description>@Beta - I like the balance and level headed nature of what you said. I believe I would have said it much the same about 10 years ago. I&#039;m not 35 and I feel that many of the generalizations of my 20s are not relevant in my 30s. With my hormones finally settling down and the hormones of my female counter parts picking up, the landscape has changed more than I expected. The most striking for me is watching women I&#039;ve known for years deal with intense sexual urges for the first times. I have friends who have moved into poly lifestyles because the female&#039;s desires suddenly exceeded the males. Still, with the way you&#039;ve obviously tried to understand the full scope of the issue and the evolutionary background behind our motives, you have most definitely earned my respect. Thank you for your level headed comment. It is appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Beta &#8211; I like the balance and level headed nature of what you said. I believe I would have said it much the same about 10 years ago. I&#8217;m not 35 and I feel that many of the generalizations of my 20s are not relevant in my 30s. With my hormones finally settling down and the hormones of my female counter parts picking up, the landscape has changed more than I expected. The most striking for me is watching women I&#8217;ve known for years deal with intense sexual urges for the first times. I have friends who have moved into poly lifestyles because the female&#8217;s desires suddenly exceeded the males. Still, with the way you&#8217;ve obviously tried to understand the full scope of the issue and the evolutionary background behind our motives, you have most definitely earned my respect. Thank you for your level headed comment. It is appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Women Regarding Starling&#8217;s &#8220;Schrödinger’s Rapist&#8221; by the beta female</title>
		<link>http://zaskoda.com/2009/10/12/a-response-to-women-regarding-starlings-schrodinger%e2%80%99s-rapist/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>the beta female</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaskoda.com/?p=389#comment-855</guid>
		<description>So, what I think to be the central issue in this man/woman/safety/rights thing is that the male sex drive is extremely potent. Men more often chase women rather than the other way around. Men are often blinded from reason by sexual desire and live in near constant sexual deprivation. That&#039;s where the attitude of angst, smugness, and defensiveness comes from. Hormones. Women do and can have a potent sex drive, but it is not the same as that of a man. It just isn&#039;t. Women do not have to try quite as hard as men to land sexual opportunities and they don&#039;t feel the urge quite as often, so men (who want it pretty much all the time) have their work cut out for them.

I am a woman and a feminist. I don&#039;t like this situation but no matter how hard I try to deny it, it is there. It doesn&#039;t make it right for men to take their chronic sexual frustration out on women, but the frequently do. That is their challenge to bear in a society where we behave in a &quot;civilized&quot; fashion and the males of the species do not have a socially acceptable right to the bodies of the females. We, at least in the United States, tend not to be polygamous either. 

Women are very scrutinizing because they can and should be. Their evolutionary desire stems not from spreading their seed to as many men as possible, but to have many children with the healthiest, best male they can find. So, they have the evolutionary tendency to refuse many males until the best one comes along. If this is true, it is also unfair. Her burden to bear is to do her best to ward off unwanted sexual advances.

There are instances where women have the upper hand  -- when men want sex. There are instances where men have the upper hand -- when women want children. It is up to both men and women to control these urges for the greater safety and benefit of society, because this is the type of world we have made for ourselves. There is a time and a place for both sex and children and I&#039;d like to think we know how to use that valuable human intellect that so many of us are proud of to know the difference.

Of course, this is evolutionary psychology which frequently feeds the world lines of bullshit that seek to keep us in our 1950s gender roles, promoting some idealistic nuclear family that has never really existed in history, but that is a different comment for a different blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what I think to be the central issue in this man/woman/safety/rights thing is that the male sex drive is extremely potent. Men more often chase women rather than the other way around. Men are often blinded from reason by sexual desire and live in near constant sexual deprivation. That&#8217;s where the attitude of angst, smugness, and defensiveness comes from. Hormones. Women do and can have a potent sex drive, but it is not the same as that of a man. It just isn&#8217;t. Women do not have to try quite as hard as men to land sexual opportunities and they don&#8217;t feel the urge quite as often, so men (who want it pretty much all the time) have their work cut out for them.</p>
<p>I am a woman and a feminist. I don&#8217;t like this situation but no matter how hard I try to deny it, it is there. It doesn&#8217;t make it right for men to take their chronic sexual frustration out on women, but the frequently do. That is their challenge to bear in a society where we behave in a &#8220;civilized&#8221; fashion and the males of the species do not have a socially acceptable right to the bodies of the females. We, at least in the United States, tend not to be polygamous either. </p>
<p>Women are very scrutinizing because they can and should be. Their evolutionary desire stems not from spreading their seed to as many men as possible, but to have many children with the healthiest, best male they can find. So, they have the evolutionary tendency to refuse many males until the best one comes along. If this is true, it is also unfair. Her burden to bear is to do her best to ward off unwanted sexual advances.</p>
<p>There are instances where women have the upper hand  &#8212; when men want sex. There are instances where men have the upper hand &#8212; when women want children. It is up to both men and women to control these urges for the greater safety and benefit of society, because this is the type of world we have made for ourselves. There is a time and a place for both sex and children and I&#8217;d like to think we know how to use that valuable human intellect that so many of us are proud of to know the difference.</p>
<p>Of course, this is evolutionary psychology which frequently feeds the world lines of bullshit that seek to keep us in our 1950s gender roles, promoting some idealistic nuclear family that has never really existed in history, but that is a different comment for a different blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

